How would you like to ask the pro-choice mob a question that is guaranteed to have them jumping around like worms on a hot rock? Well, read on.
Three facts are important to know. First, though there are certainly members of the gay community who are pro-life, go to any large public event put on by the pro-choice gang, or read any edition of the NOW Times or MS Magazine, and you will see that the “mainstream” homosexual lobby and the “mainstream” abortion lobby are joined at the hip.
Second, the current “enlightened” and “politically correct” view is that homosexuality is not a choice but a function of genetics. While I am not convinced this is true, if it is then it is only a matter of time before scientists identify the genetic marker for homosexuality.
Third, the abortion lobby has made it clear that they will never back away from their fundamental assertion that the reasons for abortion are no ones business except the women who have them.
In light of these three facts, let’s ask our enemies one simple and completely appropriate question: Should it be legal for a woman to kill her unborn child solely because there is genetic evidence that the child may turn out to be gay?
When you ask that question, their only options are to either abandon their basic position or risk alienating one of their most loyal support groups. We should also keep in mind that these people have failed this sort of test before. You may recall that standing-up for the disabled was, at one point, sold as an integral part of the liberal agenda. But the first time that effort conflicted with the abortion license, the Godless Left did not hesitate for one moment to throw the disabled under the bus.
The result is that, for example, in America today over 90 percent of babies with Down syndrome are killed in the womb. In fact, legalized abortion has so decayed American society that abortion is now the default position for women carrying a child with even the most insignificant abnormalities. In our brave new world, if a new mom delivers a handicapped baby she better be prepared to routinely answer the question, “Didn’t your doctor tell you about this while you were still pregnant?”
That sorry question and all it implies is part of the “better-dead-than-disabled” mentality that now infects our country. And make no mistake about it, that mindset is the sole responsibility of the pro-choice mob and it has helped them sell lots of abortions. To one degree or another, it has also created a rift between them and those who truly care about the disabled.
Whatever the consequences, it is pretty clear that the Choice Mafia is not going to turn off this path. They have apparently decided that they cannot afford to say that any woman should be denied her “right to choose” for any reason. If a “homosexual gene” is ever identified, the bloodbath they are currently prosecuting against Down syndrome and other “imperfect” children will be expanded to include those who might turn out to be gay. In fact, we may discover that parents are actually more likely to have a potentially gay child killed than one with Down syndrome.
If the homosexual lobby has not yet thought about this issue, it’s time they did. We need to show them that when the American holocaust turns its attention in their direction, it will be their pro-choice buddies who not only defend it but carry it out.
We should also introduce the reality that this phenomenon is not going to be limited to homosexuality. Some scientists are now speculating that genetics may influence people to embrace certain political ideologies. So imagine that someday a conservative, but otherwise pro-choice, organization launches a campaign to encourage – not force or require but simply encourage – pregnant women to kill any fetus they are carrying who is identified as having a politically liberal genetic marker. Would these pro-choice death-merchants have any problem with that?
If you analyze what genetic scientists are now suggesting, the possibilities for this line of dialog are endless. If it is true that virtually every person born into the world is a potential member of a group that could be genetically identified, that means they could be targeted for extinction through abortion.
The bizarre part of this is that, if we press this issue to its logical conclusion, the abortion lobby may be forced to adopt a completely different “abortion-justification” argument. Instead of saying that women should be allowed to abort for any reason whatsoever, they may have to say that the only women who should be allowed to abort are those who are doing so for no reason whatsoever.